<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Field Poles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electricalandelectronics.org/2008/09/13/field-poles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electricalandelectronics.org/2008/09/13/field-poles/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Explanation of Armature Reaction &#124;</title>
		<link>http://electricalandelectronics.org/2008/09/13/field-poles/comment-page-1/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>Explanation of Armature Reaction &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricalandelectronics.org/?p=51#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>[...] remarks also hold good for a multipolar generator). (i) Fig. (2.3) (i) shows the flux due to main poles (main flux) when the armature conductors carry no current. The flux across the air gap is uniform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remarks also hold good for a multipolar generator). (i) Fig. (2.3) (i) shows the flux due to main poles (main flux) when the armature conductors carry no current. The flux across the air gap is uniform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
